<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robotlegs and SWFAddress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/</link>
	<description>Are You Flexperienced?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Salahi</title>
		<link>http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>David Salahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexperiential.com/?p=298#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the feedback. And, yes I know about shaun &amp; RobotLegs. I just wish I had a better understanding of why he made that suggestion.

Cheers,
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,<br />
Thanks for the feedback. And, yes I know about shaun &#038; RobotLegs. I just wish I had a better understanding of why he made that suggestion.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Troelsen</title>
		<link>http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Troelsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexperiential.com/?p=298#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave.

Nice post - thanks for the provided code and walk through. Btw. shaun wrote RobotLegs so you better do what he says ;-)

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave.</p>
<p>Nice post &#8211; thanks for the provided code and walk through. Btw. shaun wrote RobotLegs so you better do what he says <img src='http://flexperiential.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Salahi</title>
		<link>http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>David Salahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexperiential.com/?p=298#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Shaun,
Thanks for the feedback. I just read the docs for getInstance() and instantiate() and it sounds like the main difference is that instantiate will always create a new instance while getInstance will create a new instance only if one does not yet exist. I could see where calling instantiate could lead to the creation of unnecessary objects in some scenarios. But I don&#039;t see that as a problem here. It&#039;s my understanding that Context.startup is called only once for a Context instance. So, I would expect that only a single instance of SWFAddressProxy would ever be created.

The instantiate() docs do discuss other aspects related to using dependency injectors other than the default SwiftSuspenders. I&#039;m a bit vague on those issues but, here too, that doesn&#039;t seem to be a concern for this example since I&#039;m using the default injector.

Finally, getInstance takes as a parameter a String name variable, presumably so that the caller can request a specific instance for the use case where multiple instances of a given class are being used. That doesn&#039;t seem to be an issue here either.

Maybe I&#039;m missing something, though. If that&#039;s the case, I&#039;d appreciate knowing what.

Regards,
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaun,<br />
Thanks for the feedback. I just read the docs for getInstance() and instantiate() and it sounds like the main difference is that instantiate will always create a new instance while getInstance will create a new instance only if one does not yet exist. I could see where calling instantiate could lead to the creation of unnecessary objects in some scenarios. But I don&#8217;t see that as a problem here. It&#8217;s my understanding that Context.startup is called only once for a Context instance. So, I would expect that only a single instance of SWFAddressProxy would ever be created.</p>
<p>The instantiate() docs do discuss other aspects related to using dependency injectors other than the default SwiftSuspenders. I&#8217;m a bit vague on those issues but, here too, that doesn&#8217;t seem to be a concern for this example since I&#8217;m using the default injector.</p>
<p>Finally, getInstance takes as a parameter a String name variable, presumably so that the caller can request a specific instance for the use case where multiple instances of a given class are being used. That doesn&#8217;t seem to be an issue here either.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something, though. If that&#8217;s the case, I&#8217;d appreciate knowing what.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun</title>
		<link>http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexperiential.com/?p=298#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Regarding your Update at the end of the post: you should use getInstance() rather than instantiate() - see the asdocs for the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your Update at the end of the post: you should use getInstance() rather than instantiate() &#8211; see the asdocs for the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Robotlegs and SWFAddress -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://flexperiential.com/2010/06/21/robotlegs-and-swfaddress/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Robotlegs and SWFAddress -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexperiential.com/?p=298#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Salahi, David Salahi. David Salahi said: Flex blog post: Robotlegs &amp; SWFAddress demo for deep linking (BrowserManager alternative): http://ow.ly/21rMi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Salahi, David Salahi. David Salahi said: Flex blog post: Robotlegs &amp; SWFAddress demo for deep linking (BrowserManager alternative): <a href="http://ow.ly/21rMi" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/21rMi</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

